How unnecessary complexity and confusion are hurting adoption of new payment technologies

By Ralph Bianco, President, Ralph Bianco Advisors

Guest Perspective: What’s So Alternative about ‘Alternative Payments’? Over the last few years, when was the last time a day passed without another story about “alternative payments”? Readers are subject to a constant barrage of attention-grabbing—if not outrageous—headlines about the growth and ultimate dominance of alternative payments. Such a story ran recently on CardNotPresent.com. It caught my attention—as many of its kind do—and moved me to finally respond.

The article in question claims that “e-wallets will surpass credit cards as the most popular online payment method.” The author defines “those methods” (alternative payments) to include “bank transfers, direct debits, cash on delivery, e-invoices, e-wallets, prepaid, postpaid, carrier billing and digital currencies.”

Wallets will surpass credit cards? Alternative payments being defined as bank transfers, direct debits, cash on delivery, e-invoices, e-wallets, prepaid, postpaid, carrier billing and digital currencies (basically everything except credit)? Are you confused? I sure am. What does not confuse me is why merchant and consumer adoption of new payment technologies has been so low.


To View the Full version of this Article Please Sign Up or Login

By Signing up for the CNP Report you receive:

  • Unlimited access to the entire CardNotPresent.com site
  • Share your comments on articles and join the conversation
  • Receive our CNP Report Newsletter